On Friday, March 28, the latest Mavericks beta was offered for download. Covered more extensively by Softpedia in a report earlier today, OS X Mavericks 10.9.3 Build 13D28 asks developers to focus on Graphics Drivers, Audio, Safari, Contacts & Calendar sync over USB in iTunes, and Mail. Kerberos and install on OmniOS (illumos). Dear all, I am preparing a server based on OmniOS (kernel illumos), let’s say the successor of OpenIndiana (OpenSolaris) and I would like to offer. I've made no low level changes to either my mac or iphone and addressbook syncing just works. What build version of DCS are you using here? And what are you running this on? Cheers, --Guy On 2 Aug 2010, at 16:02, Dustin Jackson wrote: > I am wondering if there is anything special that needs to be changed to get > OSX AddressBook desktop.
- Calendarserver-users Building For Mac Unity
- Calendarserver-users Building For Mac Free
- Calendarserver-users Building For Macbook Pro
Welcome to, the unofficial community for Apple news, rumors, and discussions. If you have a tech question, please check out! Community. IRC Server: irc.snoonet.org. Channel: #apple Rules. No reposts, and/or rehosted content.
No memes, direct images or contextless image/video posts. No NSFW content. Posts must foster reasonable discussion.
No editorialized link titles (use the original article’s title if applicable). No rude, offensive, or hateful comments. No posts that aren’t directly related to Apple or the Apple eco-system. No support questions outside of the Daily Tech Support sticky. We may approve your post if it is a high-level issue that can't be found through searches, or if it affects a large amount of people.
Self-promotion is allowed on Saturdays only. No content related to piracy or illegal activities.
No posts or comments relating to buying, selling, trading, giveaways or asking for advice about any of those topics. The proper place for advice is. No posts about bugs in beta software. These belong in the beta subreddits listed below. Events Event submissions must be a comment in the weekly stickied megathread, or will be removed.
Event Time Tech Support (Daily) 11am ET Wallpaper Wednesday 9am ET Self-Promotion Saturday † All Day ET † no mega thread, submit posts as usual New to Mac? Are you a new Mac owner? Not sure what to buy? Check out or ask in our dedicated sister sub! See also the for more information. Apple Subreddits.
Mac Subreddits.,.,. iOS Subreddits., or wallpapers. Beta Subreddits.
Tech Subreddits. Content Philosophy Content which benefits the community (news, rumors, and discussions) is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, etc.). This fundamental difference in audience is why we support two communities,. If you'd like to view their content together, click. This subreddit is not endorsed or sponsored by Apple Inc. I'm considering investing in a used mac mini or something similar to run OSX Server (Yosemite). From the outside looking in, it looks like it would offer a lot of utility.
Specifically, I am interested in:. file serving (afp and nfs).
git and wiki server for personal use. VPN into home network. Time Machine destination for my other macs Also being a Linux and BSD user, I am well aware there are other, cheaper solutions for most of theses tasks. I have run gitlab servers in the past, and I have also used freeNAS for nfs and AFP exports, and also as a Time Machine destination. The way I see it, OSX server's main benifits to me would be:.
easy setup, low maintenance. cleaner integration with other OSX systems. openVPN is a PITA. One click setup of a VPN server is highly appealing I am curious to see what OSX server users have to say about this. Is it really as easy as it looks?
Does it tend to be performant and reliable compared to other solutions available for the same tasks? Has OSX server been a worthwhile investment of time and money for you?
Edit: Thanks for all the replies! For those mentioning other solutions for some of the above services (eg. Debian, BSD, synology, etc.), this is pretty much what I already do. I have a freeNAS box for file storage (the mini would be an extra backup target for my Linux/OSX boxen), and at the time I was using gitlab that was hosted on a Debian. My real objective here was to simplify things a bit; I don't currently run a gitlab instance, a wiki, or a VPN on my home network, because I don't want to invest the time in maintenance/setup, not because I could not do so if I were to devote sufficient time. I've been running a Mavericks and Yosemite server for about a year for home use and it's been very reliable and fairly easy to work with. I replaced a old dying Linux server with a Mac mini and thought I'd give OS X a try, it's not terrible but when you move beyond the stuff available in the Server.app it gets messy fast.
Pros:. Apple features work great, like Time Machine.
Affordable. Easy to use if you stay in Server.app. Cons:. Any functionality beyond what is in Server.app can become a nightmare to work with. For example setting up a 'Daemon' or 'Service' application other than what is built into the OS is a real pain.
You have to use launchd and plists' and it's well documented but still pretty painful to work with compared to Linux (init.d/etc) or Windows (Services/NSSM). Very poor server application support. Very few people write their server applications for OS X, even simple things like FTP solutions are impossible to find (the built-in OS X one is mediocre at best). You end up running virtual machines for certain applications and running them as headless daemons, this works but it's a resource intensive workaround.
Poor documentation implementing certain technologies. For example integrating MySQL with OS X's Apache implementation is doable but the documentation is poor and when you run into errors you're going to be spending an exceptional amount of time on Google. Overall the Mac mini from a hardware perspective is wonderful piece of hardware for a home server.
OS X server is solid if you plan on working with only the built in services it comes with. If you plan on using your server for more than what is included in Server.app I would highly recommend saving yourself the time and headache and going with Linux (Debian is my preference) or Windows Server 2008 R2+ if you can get a license for a decent price somewhere. Both Linux and Windows are superior server products.
Debian tends to include only packages marked as stable while Ubuntu frequently pushes unstable/experimental packages which can sometimes lead to oddities you wouldn't want in a server. Debian also takes security updates much more seriously than Ubuntu does. I'm sure Ubuntu works great as a server it's just that Debian seems more well suited for the job if you compare the two on paper and since they work almost identically once you strip away the GUI (which you won't get or need for a server) it seems like a no brainer to just go with Debian in my mind. I use Divshot for some personal stuff and they had a bunch of problems on Amazon that even Amazon engineers weren't able yo resolve and they changed providers. Not a knock on Amazon although they're partly to blame of course.
One issue that comes up is the size of the customer. If you're Netflix you're going to get the full resources of tech support at your disposal because the size of the contract at stake. Divshot being a much smaller company just didn't warrant that level of support. I appreciate the general theme of what's being said here. I moved to Ubuntu on my own servers because I bought in to their claims.
Debian was too steadfast in their beliefs. For example, trying to install KDE back in the day was something you did once, it took forever, and then you waited for the next Debian release and a bit later the KDE packages that would work for that release. My skills at the time were limited and if something didn't want to install, I often didn't have a clue how to fix it. This was much easier with Ubuntu. But at the same time, Ubuntu shipping early and often to stay close to the bleeding edge introduces its own problems. From a beginner point of view Ubuntu was far easier though. But I still remember my first time with Debian coming from Mandrake (which I believe is now Mandriva).
Let's install a package. Ok, it needs these three things. Let's install the first one, ok, that needs two others.
Calendarserver-users Building For Mac Unity
Three hours later you had your original app installed. Not really three hours but it took a bit. Then on Debian it was 'apt-get install ' and a minute later it's done. I nuked my system with the apt-get dist upgrade or whatever it was more than once though. My last server, again just small personal stuff was Ubuntu and it worked beautifully. For desktop I haven't used any Linux in probably five years.
Switched to Apple hardware and love it. But for servers Linux, to me, is where it's at. Yeah it is pretty much as easy as it looks, and it works really well.
VPN is basically painless, unlike when I tried using OpenVPN. File sharing works very well with other Macs, and works fine for Windows machines.
Occasionally I get credential issues with the Windows computers, but I had the same issues when I ran a Windows server. I have not used NFS with OS X Server.
Calendarserver-users Building For Mac Free
Time Machine works well, but the last time I needed to do a restore I couldn't access the backup on the sever to restore it, I had to restore first then pull what I needed from the backup and put it back myself. This may have been fixed, or might be because the server was a Hackintosh at the time. I use Git all the time on my server, and I use Xcode Bots sometimes too.
Calendarserver-users Building For Macbook Pro
No complaints with the Git portion, at least. Xcode Bots usually work for what I want.
Mind you, the Git server is very barebones, nothing like you'd see from GitLab or GitHub. There's no pretty web interface or anything, it's just purely a Git server. If you want some of those other goodies, you might consider keeping a server for GitLab. I only glanced at the wiki server, but it worked fine when I tried it. Did what it was supposed to do. I highly recommend using the caching server if you have multiple Macs or iOS devices on the network.
Speeds up updates by quite a lot. Arstechnica did a great write up of the most recent version Overall, I'm very happy with my OS X Server, and plan to continue using it for the foreseeable future. Note: I own multiple Macs and iOS devices which are my main devices, and I have a couple Windows and Linux devices that I use sometimes.